The hidden reality behind the UK’s tree-planting hypocrisy

The hidden reality behind the UK’s tree-planting hypocrisy
cut carbon not forests - burning trees infographic

The promoting advertising marketing campaign group ‘Lower Carbon Not Forests’ has shared a mannequin new infographic that tells the story of the UK authorities’s hypocrisy on forest conservation and native local weather — displaying that appropriate now, timber want our voices.

Lower Carbon Not Forests is a hard-hitting promoting advertising marketing campaign from a coalition of environmental advocacy teams to level out the UK’s wasteful subsidies for companies that burn timber for electrical vitality and to place strain on policymakers to help reform.

The multi-channel group, led collectively by Biofuelwatch, Dogwood Alliance, the Pure Belongings Security Council and the Southern Environmental Legal guidelines Centre, requires an finish to biomass burning subsidies, redirecting billions of kilos to fill a “vital funding hole” for varied renewable vitality decisions, similar to wind and movie voltaic.

Watch the infographic beneath…

Primarily based totally on the coalition, the UK is essential shopper of biomass electrical vitality in Europe, backed by increased than £1 billion (€1.1 billion) per 12 months in authorities subsidies, paid out by way of a charge on vitality funds. The group says burning picket in vitality stations is “no elevated for the native local weather than burning coal”.

Lower Carbon Not Forests’ new infographic contrasts the realm of forest the federal authorities pledges to plant with timber as a part of its “Nature for Native local weather” fund with the realm of forest that may should be cut back down over the an similar interval to provide the UK’s huge demand for picket to burn as gasoline for electrical vitality.

A popularity for motion to assist our timber

A contemporary YouGov polling relating to public attitudes all through the UK about biomass vitality confirmed that fewer than one in 4 Britons (23%) suppose electrical vitality generated by burning picket from forests need to be categorized as renewable vitality, whereas huge majorities (upwards of 80%) as soon as extra the Authorities supporting wind and movie voltaic vitality.

85% of respondents anxious relating to the affect on wildlife if timber in forests are being cut back all the easiest way all the way in which right down to generate electrical vitality – essential end end result all through the survey.

And for the reason that COVID-19 lockdown has been eased, 82% of respondents furthermore agree that the UK ought to intention to protect enhancements in air fine quality by switching to vitality sources with no related air air air air pollution emissions. Burning biomass from forests in precise reality releases harmful air air air air pollution like particulate matter, along with native local weather air air air pollution.

Lower Carbon Not Forests, is rallying constituents to contact their Member of Parliament and press for an finish to subsidies.

Their promoting advertising marketing campaign’s establish to motion urging MPs to redirect billions in biomass subsidies to express clear and renewable vitality like image voltaic and wind shall be discovered correct proper right here.

In conditions of direct motion, activists have furthermore begun lining the put collectively tracks carrying picket pellets to the Drax plant, an indication of defiance in opposition to this soiled vitality.

Undermining environmental conservation and native local weather targets

The Environmental Audit Committee merely lately achieved a popularity for proof on biodiversity and ecosystems, in search of enter on the easiest way it can presumably elevated combine and improve its efforts to deal with biodiversity, native local weather change and sustainable enchancment.

These are laudable targets. Nonetheless the UK authorities’s tree planting and worldwide forest conservation efforts are dwarfed yearly by the scale of dangerous subsidies that it continues to provide vitality companies that import picket from abroad forests to burn for electrical vitality beneath the guise of producing renewable vitality.

This isn’t solely wasteful financially, however counterproductive to environmental conservation and native local weather targets. Keep in mind the next:

  • Per her response to a query tabled by Rosie Cooper MP relating to native tree planting, the Secretary of State for Setting, Meals and Rural Affairs acknowledged that, all through the 2020 Price range Assertion, the federal authorities launched a £640m “Nature for Native local weather fund” for England. Primarily based totally on the announcement, this may increasingly sometimes recommend an extra 30,000 hectares of timber (roughly 300 sq. kilometers), “a forest better than Birmingham,” over the subsequent 5 years.

Nonetheless, in 2019, picket pellet sourcing for Drax’s coal-to-biomass conversions at Drax Energy Station alone required sourcing of over 7 million tonnes of picket pellet, roughly 4.5 million tonnes of which had been sourced from forests all through the southern United States.

Supplying this demand required the harvesting of roughly 340 sq. kilometres of forests all through the area. At this diploma, 5 years of current thus requires 1,700 sq. kilometers of harvesting, equal to 6 occasions the realm the UK intends to plant by way of the “nature for native local weather fund.” And as quickly as additional, Drax truly imported increased than 1.5 occasions that from all sources in 2019, so all the forest harvest affect is definitely tons increased.

  • And finally, per the response Ms Cooper acquired from the Secretary of State for Worldwide Enchancment, DFID tales that it has invested £57.2 million (2017-18), £53.1 million (2018-19) and £50.8 million (2019-20) in bilateral forest programmes over the sooner three years. This implies the UK’s annual abroad forest conservation funding is lower than 4% of what it spends to subsidise importing picket from abroad forests to be burnt for vitality yearly.

Taken collectively, it’s clear that billions in UK biomass subsidies crowd out fully completely different efforts at forest conservation.

Burning timber

Biomass subsidies help the harvest and burning of huge components of timber from ecologically delicate forests all world broad for electrical vitality, contributing to their degradation and endangering the wildlife that rely on them.

Placing an finish to as shortly as and for all to the UK’s damaging legacy of reliance on biomass electrical vitality is vital to serving to reverse the biodiversity disaster and should be on the core of how the UK bolsters its conservation insurance coverage protection insurance coverage insurance policies and invests in a extremely inexperienced restoration from the COVID-19 pandemic.

What’s at stake correct proper right here is upwards of £1 billion per 12 months, at present paid to companies that burn timber for electrical vitality, however fully on the Authorities’s discretion to half out and reinvest in exact native local weather and conservation decisions.

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *